Aylmer Election Speech Restrictions
The CCF secured a victory for freedom of expression after the Town of Aylmer, Ontario, backed down from municipal election guidance that improperly restricted candidates’ free expression.
In Cynthia Prescott, et al. v. Benchwood Builders Inc., et al., the Supreme Court of Canada will consider whether homeowners can be sued for defamation over negative online reviews about a contractor.
After two Ontario homeowners posted critical reviews of a renovation company, the company sued them and sought an order barring further public comments. Although a lower court dismissed the lawsuit as a a strategic lawsuit against public participation (SLAAP) under section 137.1 of the Courts of Justice Act, the Ontario Court of Appeal allowed the case to proceed, finding that online reviews are not automatically matters of public interest. The Supreme Court will now consider how to balance freedom of expression and protection of reputation in the context of online speech.
The CCF intervened in a May 2026 hearing to argue that courts should consider the role of online platforms in modern public discourse when assessing “public interest,” and should also account for the power imbalance between homeowners and contractors, who can place liens on homes while homeowners may face lawsuits for posting good-faith reviews.
Related Cases
Skater Arrested for Holding Sign (R v Allossery)
A Windsor man was handcuffed and ticketed after peacefully skating outside City Hall while holding a protest sign, prompting the Canadian Constitution Foundation to assist with his defence.
Natural gardens case (Wolf Ruck v. Mississauga)
Wolf Ruck is a Mississauga based gardener, and he is fighting the city as a self-represented litigant over his naturalized garden on his private property. Mr. Ruck’s naturalized garden features native plants arranged to mimic a naturally occurring meadow and forest. The garden is an expression of Mr. Ruck’s environmental and ecological beliefs, and his…