Blog
Episode 39: A small win and a big loss in the fight against vaccine mandates
On Episode 39, we discuss McGill’s failed attempt to get an injunction against the protesters occupying campus; we tell you about a disappointing court ruling that upheld a B.C. vaccine mandate; and we explain why an arbitrator found Canada Post’s vax mandate unreasonable.
Stories and cases discussed in this week’s episode:
- City surrendered to Uber’s bullying tactics and abandoned Ottawa cabbies, judge rules
- Chris Selley: Cities have made their bylaws into an ass
- A judge ruled that tacos and burritos are sandwiches. What do you think?
- Here’s what I learned from my conversation with Justin Trudeau: There’s only one way to fix Canada and everyone is going to hate it
- Quebec court rejects McGill injunction request to remove encampment
- Canada Post was wrong to suspend unvaccinated remote workers during COVID, arbitrator rules
- Josh Dehaas: Is there a Charter right to campus encampments? Unlikely
- Court upholds B.C.’s COVID-19 health-care vaccine mandate
Not Reserving Judgment is a podcast about Canadian constitutional law hosted by Josh Dehaas, Joanna Baron, and Christine Van Geyn. The show is brought to you by the Canadian Constitution Foundation, a non-partisan legal charity dedicated to defending rights and freedoms. To support our work, you can donate to the CCF here.
You can find Not Reserving Judgment on Apple, Spotify, Google, YouTube, and wherever else you find your podcasts. You can also stream it directly from the show’s website.
